The Current State of Systems, Data, and AI in B2B Services

‍

B2B professional services firms operate in increasingly digital environments, yet their technological and analytical maturity remains uneven. While most organizations have adopted core systems and developed some reporting capabilities, gaps persist across commercial processes, financial visibility, and multi-entity integration. The sections below outline the current landscape across Systems, Data, AI, and Roll-up environments, highlighting the dominant patterns observed in mid-cap service firms.

‍

1. Systems: strong on recruiting, weak on revenue tracking

Professional services firms have digitized several core workflows, but system usage varies significantly by function. Delivery and HR processes tend to be structured and well tooled, whereas marketing and sales systems are less consistently adopted.

Current characteristics

• Project management and HR workflows are the most digitized and system-driven.
• CRM usage is inconsistent, especially in firms where commercial activity is partner-led.
• Revenue forecasting remains unreliable due to incomplete or irregular pipeline updates.
• Margin tracking is difficult because sales, payroll, time tracking, and delivery systems rarely reconcile cleanly.
• Cross-sell between business units is hindered by system fragmentation and differing commercial processes.

System landscape

• Many mid-caps still rely on legacy monolithic platforms as their operational backbone.
• Cloud tools are introduced incrementally but seldom replace the core system of record.
• Advanced features in point solutions (e.g., CRM automation, project analytics) are underused due to process immaturity or limited internal ownership.

‍

2. Data: From Basic Connectors to Complex Multi-System Transformations

Most firms operate with some level of reporting infrastructure, but the depth of their data environment depends heavily on how many systems feed into their KPIs and how integrated those systems are.

Data maturity patterns

• Less mature firms rely on basic API connectors linking their ERP, CRM, and timesheet tools.
• Reporting is often semi-manual and limited to operational dashboards.
• More advanced firms centralize data into a modern warehouse architecture, combining ERP, CRM, payroll, time tracking, and PM tools.
• Significant transformation is required to calculate key indicators such as project margin, utilization, or realized vs. forecasted revenue.

Operational consequences

• Producing accurate, consolidated views (e.g., client-level margin, BU-level profitability) is labor-intensive.
• Data reliability varies depending on the underlying processes, tool adoption, and data cleaning practices.
• Multi-entity structures introduce inconsistent data schemas and naming conventions, complicating consolidation.

‍

3. AI: Strong Traction in Delivery, Selective Use in Commercial and Operational Functions

AI adoption is happening across the sector, with the clearest impact observed in delivery-centric workflows. Adoption in sales, finance, and operations depends on the sophistication of underlying systems and data.

Observed use cases

• Delivery teams use AI to create client-facing materials, accelerate research, and automate low-level production tasks.
• Some firms build or incorporate custom AI applications tailored to their expertise (e.g., domain-specific analysis, content generation).
• Modern CRMs and collaboration tools include AI-driven features such as meeting summaries, task suggestions, or scoring predictions.

Constraints on impact

• AI features depend on consistent system usage—irregular CRM adoption limits commercial AI benefits.
• Data fragmentation and inconsistent pipeline processes restrict advanced AI use in forecasting or margin analysis.
• AI remains most effective in areas where inputs are unstructured (content) rather than structured (financial or operational).

4. Roll-Ups: System and Data Complexity as a Structural Condition

M&A-based growth strategies, particularly PE-backed roll-ups, significantly influence the digital landscape. Acquired entities often arrive with their own systems, processes, and data models.

Typical conditions

• Newly acquired companies maintain their original tools, resulting in heterogeneous stacks across the group.
• Centralization of systems is slow, and in many cases not prioritized during early integration.
• External managed IT providers often manage legacy infrastructure, reducing flexibility in tool consolidation.

Impact on operations

• Cross-company reporting is difficult due to differing system setups and data definitions.
• Group-level forecasting or margin tracking requires complex reconciliation across entities.
• Identifying cross-sell opportunities becomes challenging without unified CRM or pipeline views.

‍